Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Laser HT: Sightline setbacks for radiation exposure minimization

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Laser HT: Sightline setbacks for radiation exposure minimization

    URL=Class 2
    LASER RADIATION
    DO NOT STARE INTO BEAM
    CLASS 2 LASER PRODUCT

    A Class 2 laser is safe because the blink reflex will limit the exposure to no more than 0.25 seconds. It only applies to visible-light lasers (400–700 nm). Class-2 lasers are limited to 1 mW continuous wave, or more if the emission time is less than 0.25 seconds or if the light is not spatially coherent. Intentional suppression of the blink reflex could lead to eye injury. Many laser pointers and measuring instruments are class 2.

    Class 2M
    LASER RADIATION
    DO NOT STARE INTO BEAM OR VIEW
    DIRECTLY WITH OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS
    CLASS 2M LASER PRODUCT

    A Class 2M laser is safe because of the blink reflex if not viewed through optical instruments. As with class 1M, this applies to laser beams with a large diameter or large divergence, for which the amount of light passing through the pupil cannot exceed the limits for class 2.

    Class 3R 10 feet safety setback
    LASER RADIATION
    AVOID DIRECT EYE EXPOSURE
    CLASS 3R LASER PRODUCT

    A Class 3R laser is considered safe if handled carefully, with restricted beam viewing. With a class 3R laser, the MPE can be exceeded, but with a low risk of injury. Visible continuous lasers in Class 3R are limited to 5 mW. For other wavelengths and for pulsed lasers, other limits apply.

    Class 3B 7.5 inches safety setback
    LASER RADIATION
    AVOID EXPOSURE TO BEAM
    CLASS 3B LASER PRODUCT

    A Class 3B laser is hazardous if the eye is exposed directly, but diffuse reflections such as those from paper or other matte surfaces are not harmful. The AEL for continuous lasers in the wavelength range from 315 nm to far infrared is 0.5 W. For pulsed lasers between 400 and 700 nm, the limit is 30 mJ. Other limits apply to other wavelengths and to ultrashort pulsed lasers. Protective eyewear is typically required where direct viewing of a class 3B laser beam may occur. Class-3B lasers must be equipped with a key switch and a safety interlock. Class 3B lasers are used inside CD and DVD writers, although the writer unit itself is class 1 because the laser light cannot leave the unit.

    Class 4 4 inches safety setback
    LASER RADIATION
    AVOID EYE OR SKIN EXPOSURE TO
    DIRECT OR SCATTERED RADIATION
    CLASS 4 LASER PRODUCT

    Class 4 is the highest and most dangerous class of laser, including all lasers that exceed the Class 3B AEL. By definition, a class 4 laser can burn the skin, or cause devastating and permanent eye damage as a result of direct, diffuse or indirect beam viewing. These lasers may ignite combustible materials, and thus may represent a fire risk. These hazards may also apply to indirect or non-specular reflections of the beam, even from apparently matte surfaces—meaning that great care must be taken to control the beam path. In most U.S states it is illegal to sell preassembled class 4 lasers, however a citizen can construct a class 4 laser for personal use. Class 4 lasers must be equipped with a key switch and a safety interlock. Most industrial, scientific, military, and medical lasers are in this category.
    Attached Files
    https://twitter.com/CINERAMAX<br /><br />https://WALLSCREEN-SKYLOUNGES.COM

  • #2
    New Laser-based Projector Classifications Lift a Significant Market Burden on the Projection Industry
    05.20.14

    0
    San Jose, CA –The Laser Illuminated Projector Association (LIPA), applauds the efforts of the dedicated scientists of the International Electrotechnical Commission’s (IEC) for the May 16 publication of IEC 60825-1:2014, also known as ‘Edition 3’. This standard acknowledges, among many other updates, that laser illuminated projectors (LIPs) should be classified the same way as lamp-based projectors; rather than as laser light show products. This action effectively acknowledges that the light emitted from LIPs is unlike that of collimated laser beams used in light shows or other direct laser beam products.

    The IEC’s Technical Council 76 (TC76), which drafted and debated the new standard, is an international group of laser experts which ensured that Edition 3 (IEC 60825-1:2014) reflects the current scientific knowledge. The group based their analysis upon comprehensive scientific review of the latest laser products.

    “Congratulations to the TC76 Committee and working groups who worked tirelessly on updating the 60825 standards with Edition 3,” noted Pete Ludé, chairman of LIPA’s regulatory committee. “The IEC has recognized the changing nature of laser and projection technology and helped to lift a significant market burden on the projection industry. We look forward to further updates to IEC standards, such as the IEC 62471-5, and the prompt actions by governments and regulatory bodies around the world to update regulations to reflect this important new international standard.”

    Almost every country bases its product safety regulations upon the IEC standards, and many will now take additional steps to ensure its effective implementation. Many countries, including the U.S. and the European Union member states, are in various stages of review of the new standard for consistency with its existing laws and regulations.

    In the U.S., LIPA will continue to collaborate with the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), to ensure the regulatory pathway reflects the latest in scientific findings and permits the adoption of these energy-saving, brighter projectors. In the European Union, LIPA will continue to work with local jurisdictions to ensure that LIPs meet consumer and workplace safety regulations, and those regulations are consistent with optical radiation directives.

    LIPA members will also continue their work with the IEC to ensure that the body of standards under which the majority of LIPs will now fall (IEC 62471-5, Edition 1) takes into consideration the unique aspects of image projectors and creates appropriate scientific-based recommendations for their risk classification, and does not place unnecessarily burdensome regulations upon LIPs manufacturers.

    - See more at: http://necsel.com/news/2014/new-lase....DSDm7z3S.dpuf
    https://twitter.com/CINERAMAX<br /><br />https://WALLSCREEN-SKYLOUNGES.COM

    Comment


    • #3
      im compiling all perspectives...tbc
      https://twitter.com/CINERAMAX<br /><br />https://WALLSCREEN-SKYLOUNGES.COM

      Comment

      Working...
      X