Tweet
Recently acquired by Amazon Webservices videocompression specialist Elemental Technologies, also showed a comparison between 60 frames per second versus 120 frames per second. Higher frame rates should provide smoother motion and allow for less motion blurr, but to the latter 120 FPS is insufficient. The material was filmed at 120 frames per second, but the 60P video also ran smoothly, unlike the NHK demo two years ago. that showed serious stutter in the 60P rendition, later it turned out to be caused by the fact that NHK had just dropped everyother frame. So Elemental clearly used a better framerate conversion method
The difference between the 60 and 120 frames per second video was marked in person, in video instead of still captures. The edges of the vehicles where cleaner in the 120 FPS bottom half of the screen, so was the on truck lettering. But still these examples begin to show that temporal resolution is another part to the move to 'better pixels', besides the move to 10 Bits, 4K, Wide Colour Gamut and Higher Dynamic Range .
The difference between the 60 and 120 frames per second video was marked in person, in video instead of still captures. The edges of the vehicles where cleaner in the 120 FPS bottom half of the screen, so was the on truck lettering. But still these examples begin to show that temporal resolution is another part to the move to 'better pixels', besides the move to 10 Bits, 4K, Wide Colour Gamut and Higher Dynamic Range .