Wolfgang, this projector was not developed to address the theater market(s). Christie has always been hesitant to spend management time and engineering time to the residential market. As Nigel posted again, the response to his insistance was; as long as it doesn't cost us engineering time, and i would add consequently management time, and attention.
Xenon would require a redesign.
As for color, well in a planetarium show one can basically render anything one likes. Car design, same thing. Geology, a wide range might be useful.
JVC has been supplying laser phosphor for years (there was one year with rgb laser, probably not made it really to market), both 4K, 4K+e-shift and 8K. And those projectors did not even offer very high total brightness, all for up-time, uniformity, stability, service lifetime, and so on.
As for Sony vs. JVC, the Sony 760 is older and so a bit les than the NX9 and yes the new 870 has an UVP, of 25K, or 10K over the 15K of the NX9. The JVC and Sony 4K laser-phosphor higher end HT models are both considerably more, and yes the 4500 is less than the 5000.
As for the on-off 1000x1000 = 1 million, or 1500x1500 = 2 million is more what one would expect from the concept, 2000x2000=4 million to one, on the high-end. But that's what Nigel says he measured 444 divided by 0.00002 is 22 million, who knows what the folks at Christie did to enhance the performance...
Xenon would require a redesign.
As for color, well in a planetarium show one can basically render anything one likes. Car design, same thing. Geology, a wide range might be useful.
JVC has been supplying laser phosphor for years (there was one year with rgb laser, probably not made it really to market), both 4K, 4K+e-shift and 8K. And those projectors did not even offer very high total brightness, all for up-time, uniformity, stability, service lifetime, and so on.
As for Sony vs. JVC, the Sony 760 is older and so a bit les than the NX9 and yes the new 870 has an UVP, of 25K, or 10K over the 15K of the NX9. The JVC and Sony 4K laser-phosphor higher end HT models are both considerably more, and yes the 4500 is less than the 5000.
As for the on-off 1000x1000 = 1 million, or 1500x1500 = 2 million is more what one would expect from the concept, 2000x2000=4 million to one, on the high-end. But that's what Nigel says he measured 444 divided by 0.00002 is 22 million, who knows what the folks at Christie did to enhance the performance...
Comment